Your Solicitors for Commercial Disputes
Cunningtons can assist in resolving a broad range of commercial disputes, including:
- Intellectual Property and Domain Name Disputes;
- Partnership Disputes;
- Company Shareholder Disputes;
- Contract Disputes;
- Defamation & Brand Protection;
- and general Consumer Advice.
Have a look at the information below, and if we can be of any help, please contact us for a chat.
When business partnership doesn’t run smoothly
Friends, family and trusted associates will often go into business together. Sometimes complete strangers will work together and inadvertently form a partnership, which carries with it certain rights and imposes certain duties on the parties, even if they do not realise it.
The protection provided by a Partnership Agreement
Whilst a future dispute can often be something which none of the parties have envisaged, many disputes do arise where no partnership agreement exists and Cunningtons can advise on the rights, duties and terms of any unwritten partnership.
A properly drafted partnership agreement will often include provisions for the resolution of disputes and set out the specific rights, duties and liabilities of the partners in certain circumstances, notably when a partner leaves, dies or is expelled from the partnership and how that person’s share is to be calculated.
Even where a partnership agreement does exist, arguments sometimes about the interpretation of its terms or its effect, and alleged breaches of it.
Cunningtons can assist you in resolving partnership disputes.
Advice and help for company shareholders in disputes
Cunningtons advises both companies and individuals in respect of:
- breaches of shareholder agreements,
- minority shareholder claims,
- derivative claimes and
- unfair prejudice disputes.
If you are a shareholder or director and are considering or facing a claim that the company is not being run properly, Cunningtons can assist you.
Contract law pervades every aspect of our lives
Buying a loaf of bread in a shop, entering into a tenancy agreement, buying a house and starting a new job are just examples of situations where contracts arise. Disputes often arise in relation to the performance of contractual obligations.
Such disputes may turn on the interpretation of a written contractual clause or on evidence regarding what was agreed orally. One party to the contract may believe that they have complied with an agreed term of the contract but the other does not.
The courts apply certain principles and presumptions in determining what it was that the parties intended when they entered into the agreement.
Further, the law will sometimes impose contractual obligations into agreements depending on the circumstances of the case and the status of the parties. A good example of this is the contractual rights that the law imposes into consumer contracts which cannot even be excluded by agreement between the parties.
We can assist you in bringing and responding to claims for breach of express or implied terms of contracts whether those contracts are in writing or oral.
Intellectual Property and Domain Name Disputes
These days your online presence is more important than ever
The brand and set up of a business and the products, as well as the intellectual property rights owned by it, can often be a considerably valuable asset of that business.
If someone has copied your work or design, is offering goods or services under a registered trademark you are the proprietor of, or is otherwise using your goodwill or passing themselves off as you in order to sell their products or services, we can assist in bringing this a claim to stop this.
However, we live in free market and competition between competing businesses is generally considered a good thing for the ultimate consumer.
Intellectual property rights generally exist to protect the financial investment a business puts into generating its goodwill with customers or original products and services which it offers, and not to stifle competition.
Cunningtons can assist with resolving disputes which relate to things such as alleged breaches of copyright, design rights, trade mark infringement or passing off.
Looking after client lists and data theft
Equally, lists of clients and information databases can also be a valuable asset of a business and its theft or duplication by unscrupulous individuals and/or employees can often be very detrimental to it.
Rights exist in databases, which have been complied with the time, effort and often considerable financial investment on the part of the business. These rights can be enforced, and we can assist you in bringing or defending a claim.
Your website is your business’s front door
Websites are often the first point of contact for customers and clients and therefore the right domain name is a valuable asset to a business. Cyber-squatting occurs when someone registers a domain name which you want – or may want in the future – with the sole intention of selling it to you at some other point in time.
There are also individuals what deliberately cause damage to a business by registering a domain name similar to yours with a view to causing you or your business damage. In such circumstances, action can be taken. This can often result in the transfer of ownership of the domain name from the infringing party to the rightful owner.
We offer legal help and advice on all aspects of intellectual property and domain name disputes.
Defamation & Brand Protection
Branding is important in today’s business world: protecting it has never been so important
Freedom of speech and the right to have an opinion is a fundamental principle enjoyed in this country. However, this right can be abused and the law seeks to address situations where a company or person is attempting to damage another person or company’s reputation.
If disparaging comments are being made about you or your business and these statements are likely to cause serious harm and in particular, serious financial consequences, we may be able to assist you in bringing a claim based on defamation.
Consumers need protection
Cunningtons is able to provide advice to retailers, service providers and consumers in respect of claims relating to faulty goods or unsatisfactory services which have been rendered.
We obviously try to identify relevant evidence and law which is in your favour at an early stage and consider that which is not. However, this is an ongoing process and certain facts and evidence might not immediately be identified at the outset. If, following what is an ongoing assessment, it is clear that a case will be won or lost, you will be advised of this.
However, there would be no need for lawyers if the law was always black and white. Cases very rarely go to trial or are argued about if they are clear cut. Very strong or weak cases normally settle before incurring the cost and risk of court proceedings on the best terms possible. Cases that go to trial are those which have arguable points and could often go either way.
A lot of the time we are not able to advise clients conclusively about whether or not their case will be successful because there are a lot of variables. The best that is normally possible is to provide a risk assessment, based on the evidence before us and relevant law. This is broadly called “litigation risk” and exists in every case. Litigation risk is something that needs to be considered at all times and in deciding on what steps to take in a case. Also, every client is different and ultimately it is up to them to decide where to draw the line based on our advice and what risks they are willing to take.
Depending on the type of claim, the Court has set down a number of rules, called Pre-action Protocols, which set out the expected conduct of a potential litigant. If no specific Protocol applies, there is a general Practice Direction which will apply.
Broadly, any formal litigation or court process is expected to be the last resort. The parties are expected to behave reasonably, giving each other time to set out their respective cases, provide evidence and discuss settlement.
The failure to observe this conduct can lead to a Court penalising a defaulting party.
The simple answer to this is no.
Generally speaking, only a Court or tribunal can order one party to pay the other party’s legal costs. Before a claim is issued, the Court has no jurisdiction to do this. Once a claim is issued, then the pre-action cost incurred can be claimed. However, someone would be ill advised to issue their claim without going through the expected attempts to reach an agreement first.
Special types of offer, called Part 36 Offers, can sometimes be made and, if accepted, would entitle a party to claim their legal costs up to the date of acceptance.
There may also be a contractual right to claim the costs of dealing with the dispute, depending on the terms of any contract involved.
For most cases, we would charge on an hourly rate basis but every case and client is different. We are more than happy to consider funding options including fixed fees, fee caps and alternative funding arrangements like ‘no win, no fee‘ agreements or damages-based agreements with clients.
Please do not be afraid to ask – we are very approachable. However, it is important that clients understand that we are a business and it might not be economically viable for us to offer certain things.
This depends on a large number of factors, but broadly how complex the matter is and how much work will be required. We do not charge based on how long a matter takes to resolve, but on how much work it takes to resolve it.
Clearly, achieving an early settlement means that less work is required than going all the way to a defended trial and taking all of the steps necessary to get there. However, sometimes it is necessary to take certain steps before a settlement can be achieved.
Two particularly important stages of litigation are disclosure, when the parties formally exchange documentation about the claim, and exchange of witness statements, when the parties set out the detail of the facts of the case.
However, it does take time to reach these stages and deal with them properly, which is why the Court expects a party, to a lesser extent, undertake these steps before issuing a claim, as it can lead to settlement once each party can consider the evidence and basis of the claim.
There are alternative dispute resolution processes which can, and in some cases, must be considered. These are an alternative to court proceedings.
These include written, without prejudice negotiations, face to face meetings, formal mediation, expert determination, mediation and arbitration. The effectiveness of these processes depends on the parties’ willingness to compromise and some options may be more effective than others, depending on the type of case.
For example, boundary disputes are very conducive to expert determination and mediation, where an independent third party surveyor can try to assist the parties with reaching an agreement at a site mediation. In more complex construction disputes, the parties are expected to have a face to face without prejudice meeting.
In every case, there should be some attempt at without prejudice, written or telephone negotiations.
You may very well be an expert in your trade. We are regularly instructed by professionals and tradespeople who, to them, the matter appears very straight forward.
However, where there are technical arguments about things, the Court expects expert evidence on the point to be provided. This can be done by appointing separate experts or by jointly instructing a single expert.
For example, we have been instructed in cases involving alleged negligence by surveyors, in which there are very technical arguments about subsidence or the historical movement of a property. The surveyor will clearly seek to argue that there is no subsidence whereas the property owner would seek to argue that there is. The Court will expect expert evidence on the point from third parties to be provided. Sometimes, cases involve complicated forensic analysis, for which an expert accountant will be required.
We will advise you about the need to obtain expert evidence and when this might be appropriate.
The basic position is that “costs follow the event”. This means that if you are successful in bringing or defending a claim, then you will also be awarded your legal costs.
Depending on the type of claim, the Court will assess what proportion of the legal costs should be paid by the losing party, taking into account various things, including the value of the claim, amount of work undertaken and attempts to settle.
In higher value claims, this process is called detailed assessment and involves following a specific process until, if an agreement cannot be reached, a court hearing takes place. This will involve incurring further legal costs, some of which may also be recoverable from the losing party.
In lower value claims, the court will normally undertake a summary assessment of the legal costs. This is a rough and ready assessment of what costs the Court considers should be payable by a party and normally takes place after a hearing, during which arguments about the costs are heard.
For claimants, it is also important to understand that if a claim is issued but not defended, then the costs that can be recovered are called fixed costs and are very low and in the region of around £130. Fixed costs apply in some other circumstances, for example, in possession claims.
Because of the way in which the Court works, it is not often that a winning party will be awarded all of the legal costs that they incur.
There are several reasons why this is important.
Firstly, the Courts expect all parties to behave reasonably and to try to settle their matters. This is not the same as saying someone must make an offer of settlement but it is important that clients understand that if an offer of settlement is not made and there is no attempt to settle a case, then the Court can take this into consideration on whether or not to award a party their legal costs.
Secondly, a good offer of settlement does have tactical value. If it is beaten at trial, this can later be highlighted and the Court might look favourably on this and consider awarding a greater portion of the offeror’s legal costs.
There are also some special types of offers which can be made, called Part 36 Offers, which if beaten at trial, will significantly improve the prospect of a more favourable costs award being made for the offeror.
However, an offer of settlement must be genuine. If a Court considers that it was made solely for the purpose of securing a tactical benefit, the Court is likely to disregard it when considering what costs to award.
What a client is prepared to offer or accept in settlement depends on a client’s appetite for risk and willingness to accept the aggravation and cost of dealing with a claim. The strength of any claim is also an important factor to consider the strength of the parties’ positions and risk in the case also needs to be considered.
The cost of getting the matter to a conclusion is a consideration, as there will normally be an element of irrecoverable cost to a client.
There is no specific rule about what an offer should be, as every case and every client is different.
Separate steps will need to be taken to enforce a judgment if a judgment debtor does not pay.
This can include instructing bailiffs, securing a charge for the debt against property, obtaining an order that the debtor’s employer pay a proportion of the debt directly from the debtors wages or seeking an order that a third party who owes the debtor pays the creditor the money owed instead.
These steps all have a cost implication, so it is important that before any claim is issued, some consideration is given to the financial circumstances of the other party. If a debtor has no money or assets, the judgment may go unpaid.
Landlord's Possession Order
Being a Residential landlord is no easy ride: read how it can go wrong, and how a good litigation solicitor can help.