Background to Inheritance Laws
In some countries, forced heirship is imposed, which means that even if you make a Will, irrespective of what it says, part of your estate when you die will pass to certain individuals, such as children or your spouse.
England and Wales has for many years recognised that individuals have a certain degree of responsibility to provide for their families when they die, but at the same time it tries to preserve that person’s right to leave their assets to whomsoever they choose when they die. The right to leave your assets to anyone is called “freedom of testamentary disposition”.
The Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 seeks to maintain a balance between someone’s right to leave their assets to who they wish but also ensure that family members or others that are financially dependent on the deceased are not overlooked. This is the most recent Act of Parliament on the subject, but follows previous legislation which was historically enacted to achieve this balance.
If, especially after reading this article, you feel that you have been unfairly treated in a Will, you may be able to make a legal claim on a deceased’s estate. But you will have to act quickly …
What underlies the Inheritance Act?
Put into historical context, men would often be the breadwinners and the women would normally stay at home and look after the children. This valuable contribution to the family home naturally meant that the woman would be unable to generate income of her own to support herself. If a couple were not married when the man died, his assets would pass by the rules of intestacy and it would be unlikely that the woman would receive anything (although the children probably would).
Worse still, even if they were married and the man had made a Will leaving his assets to anyone but his family, would it be right to leave that family financially destitute?
Whilst this is an extreme example, this is the sort of thing the Inheritance Act is intended to address.
Who can make a claim/application in the case of lack of Inheritance?
There are only a few people who are entitled to make a claim under the Inheritance Act. The categories of applicant are contained in Section 1(1) of the Act. These are:-
- The existing spouse or civil partner of the deceased;
- A former spouse or former civil partner of the deceased, but not one who has formed a subsequent marriage or civil partnership;
- A person who, during the whole of the period of two years ending immediately before the date when the deceased died, was living in the same household as the deceased as the husband, wife or civil partner of the deceased;
- A child of the deceased;
- Any person (not being a child of the deceased) who was effectively treated as a child of the deceased and the deceased stood in the role of a parent; or
- Any person who immediately before the death of the deceased was being maintained, either wholly or partly, by the deceased;
What does the Court take account of?
It is very important to understand that the Inheritance Act does not exist to allow people who think they should have received something more from a deceased’s estate to make a claim.
The Inheritance Act exists to assist people who have not received a ‘reasonable financial provision’ from the estate. The law deliberately does not define what a ‘reasonable financial provision’ is. The Courts have repeatedly pointed out in cases that this is not desirable or sensible, as every case and the circumstances of all of the parties to it will differ.
Instead, the Court will apply certain criteria and has again in cases pointed out that no particular criterion is more important than any of the others. The circumstances that the Court will take account of are contained in Section 3 of the Inheritance Act and are:
- The financial resources and needs that the applicant has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future;
- The financial resources and needs which any other applicant (as more than one person can make an application) has – or is likely to have – in the foreseeable future;
- The financial resources and needs which any beneficiary of the estate has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future;
- Any obligations and responsibilities which the deceased had towards any applicant or towards any beneficiary of the estate of the deceased;
- The size and nature of the net estate of the deceased;
- Any physical or mental disability of any applicant or any beneficiary of the estate of the deceased; and
- Any other matter, including the conduct of the applicant or any other person, which in the circumstances of the case the Court may consider relevant.
In relation to married couples, the Court will also consider the age of the applicant and the duration of the marriage or civil partnership and the contribution made by the applicant to the welfare of the family of the deceased, including any contribution made by looking after the home or caring for the family.
For married couples who have split up and not formed a new relationship, the Court will consider what the position would have been if the marriage had come to an end by divorce.
What can the Court do in cases of disinheritance?
As mentioned above, the Court can make an order which it considers fair and reasonable in all the circumstances to amount to a reasonable financial provision for the applicant for their maintenance.
In the case of the spouse or civil partner of the deceased, the Court is not restricted to just this and can make additional order, recognising the special relationship that marriage constitutes, which might not necessarily be restricted to maintenance alone.
The Court can make the following orders:
- An order for periodical payments;
- An order for the payment of a lump sum;
- An order for the transfer to the applicant of property;
- An order for the settlement for the benefit of the applicant of such property comprised in that estate as may be so specified (this is often a life interest or occupational right, giving someone the right to continue to live in a property); and/or
- An order varying any settlement which was reached during divorce proceedings or the marriage.
Will I win if I make an application?
It is very easy to establish that someone is entitled to make a claim and normally quite plain to see if a Will does not make a reasonable financial provision. A classic example of this is when someone has been written out of the Will completely.
It is more difficult when someone has been left something but it is ‘not enough’ and, connected to this, is the considerably more difficult question – and one which clients understandably find frustrating – of ‘how much’ they should have been left in the Will.
As there is such a number of criteria and lots of factual nuances to any case, it is very difficult to predict the outcome from a financial point of view. What can normally be advised upon is a broad range of outcomes, but the amount that is finally awarded is decided on the day of the eventual trial, if a settlement cannot be achieved.
I think I have an intestacy claim. What do I do now?
You have a very strict time limit to bring a claim. This is six months from the date of the grant of probate or letters of administration (if there is no Will). It would be a very rare case indeed where someone was able to bring a claim after this time.
These applications can become complex, particularly when some consideration needs to be given to obtaining actuarial evidence. There is a huge amount of criteria that the Court takes into consideration and evidence on all of these is normally necessary. For example, we acted for the severely disabled biological son of the deceased who had been left nothing from his father’s will. Careful consideration of the cost of that client’s future care and the availability of government benefits and grants was very important.
It is also not uncommon for other claims to be pursued alongside an application under the Inheritance Act. For example, a claim for proprietary estoppel is not uncommon. Proprietary estoppel occurs where someone has made a financial contribution towards a property with the intention (presumed or actual) of obtaining an interest in that property. This most often arises with cohabiting couples who buy or contribute to property together, but for one reason or another, only one person’s name is on the property.
There can also sometimes be allegations of undue influence or a lack of capacity to make a Will, which may impact on its validity. Again, these are considerations to take account of before embarking on any potential claim.
Whilst in recent years the Courts have tried to accommodate litigants in person, these sorts of cases are not straightforward debt claims or contractual disputes between people. There are a lot of considerations to take account of and legal advice on these cases is vital. You should seek this as soon as possible, particularly as there is a very short period of time in which a claim can be made.
There has been a noticeable increase in the number of Inheritance Act cases which have reached the Courts in recent years. The reasons for this are likely to be varied but are probably as a result of the changing nature of the family unit and the fact that we have, for several years now, lived in a time of austerity, resulting in an increased number of people living in some degree of financial hardship.
In particular, we have noticed that marriage is no longer central to a relationship and that many couples are happy to live as a family without ever marrying. However, this can have unforeseen and undesirable consequences.
An example of an Inheritance Act claim
In one matter, our client was not a joint owner of the property in question. The client’s partner who was the legal owner of the house died without leaving a Will and therefore the entirety of his estate passed to their children, who were well under the age of 18. Our client had no objection to this on the face of it and in fact our client’s intention was to make a Will leaving everything to them. The only concern for our client was that when the children turned 18, they might very well make the decision to sell our client’s only home and there would be little that could be done to prevent this. It was not a case of the client not wanting the children to have the estate when our client died, it was more a concern about the children being influenced by third parties in the future to try and sell the property. The Inheritance Act enabled our client to be able to apply for a remedy from the Court.
Societal changes and Inheritance Act claims
We have also noticed that there is an increased number of disputes arising from family units which include children from previous relationships. This seems to cause contention between siblings and step-siblings. Biological children often consider themselves more entitled to something from the estate than step-children, who might very well have been brought up effectively as the deceased’s own child. Disputes between siblings are also not uncommon, with allegations of unfairness or estrangement being commonplace.
The law is constantly evolving and claims of this nature are no different. The 1975 Act has been amended by several Acts of Parliament over the years to take account of the changing nature of society and the family unit. There is no doubt that disputes over inheritance will continue, particularly in times of economic downturn when people do find themselves in positions of financial hardship.
A final point to note is that whilst it is impossible to prevent an Inheritance Act claim from arising, particularly as such a claim is contingent on future events and the future financial circumstances of the relevant parties, a properly drafted Will can help to minimise the risk of this.
You might find these posts on Inheritance issues helpful
- Inheritance Act Claims by Adult Children: Miles and Shearer v Shearer
- Disputing Your Mental Capacity To Make A Will
Please feel free to comment below if you have been affected by these issues.