416 thoughts on “My Seller Lied To Me! When Is It Property Misrepresentation?”
I offered on a flat that the estate agent told me was being sold share of freehold. This affected our decision to offer on the flat rather than another property we had seen and increased our offer. Through the conveyancing process we discovered that the flat was not share of freehold after all. When we questioned the estate agent we were told that the freeholder had changed their mind about selling the freehold.
If we decide not to go through with the purchase is the estate agent liable for our fees as they told us the property was share of freehold and did not notify us of the change?
We would think it unlikely that there would be any basis of claim. The freeholder may very well have changed their mind as any seller would be entitled to do before exchange of contracts.
If you do consider that the marketing or advertisement of the property was in some way misleading, you could consider making a complaint to any relevant redress scheme that the estate agent belongs to.
I’d like advice on stopcocks please. On 2nd viewing, after our offer had been accepted, we found a leak in the property which is a top floor flat. We looked for the stopcock in the flat to turn off the water but couldn’t find it. Seller had indicated stopcock (and water meter) were in the hall cupboard. We flagged the leak to the solicitor and said we could not find the stopcock. The water meter was actually outside, in the road. We got the reply that the leak had been fixed and the stopcock was in the cupboard. Date for completion has now been agreed. Our solicitor suggested we do a final check on the leak. This time the water had been turned off. Still no sign of the stopcock so we asked a neighbour who said there were no internal ones, only ones out under covers on the road. We can’t now check to see if any of the pipes are leaking as obviously don’t have access. Water co said it is strongly advisable for flats to have internal stopcocks, and that’s what we were expecting. It seems so minor but I don’t want to move in and find a ton of problems with leaky pipes. Seller just seems to be wasting our time over this. They also have the key to the garage which they said they would drop off to the agent. The agent doesn’t have it and the seller has now gone to an amber country. He doesn’t know when they’ll be back. Originally the seller didn’t even know the garage was part of the property – only when we got the deeds we could see it. We haven’t even been able to see in it as nobody has the key and with quarantine the seller won’t make it back before the completion date. Am now wondering if the cooker and washing machine will be working, let alone the heating, as the sellers seem so unreliable! The flat has been tenanted for a long time but even so…Is any of this misrepresentation?
Thank you for your comment. A misrepresentation occurs when someone says something that the other party relies on when entering into the contract and that statement is not accurate, causing a loss to the other party.
You should discuss the position with your solicitor. In particular, if you are unsure of the contractual position, you might want to discuss the point that clause 3 of the standard conditions of sale (which are normally incorporated into the contract) state that the buyer accepts the property in the physical condition that it is in on exchange.
I purchased a house the beginning of the year, when we looked around the property we specifically asked the Estate agent if there were any issue with neighbours etc. we were told not at all its a lovely neighbourhood. We then decided to proceed with the purchase, and on the forms the sellers stated that they did not have any issues with neighbouring properties. However since moving in, this was obviously not the case and we have since learned that the sellers had issues with the neighbour and that was the reason that they wanted to move. Since moving in we have had endless issues with the same neighbour relating to drugs, loud music and general anti social behaviour. We have two small children who as scared in there own homes so this is a real problem. Do we have any grounds for claims against the sellers?
We are sorry to hear of this and sadly, it is not uncommon. There are examples of cases where sellers have been ordered to pay damages to buyers because they have suggested that there are no disputes with neighbours and this turns out to be untrue.
Whether or not there is any sort of misrepresentation claim here will depend a great deal on the written correspondence and documentation, specifically the property information form. What you have been told orally is less likely to be relevant because the standard conditions of sale normally incorporated into a contract of sale exclude these as being actionable. An exception to this would be in cases of fraud.
Please do feel free to get in touch if you would like to consider the matter in more detail with us.
Supporting Farleigh Hospice | Limited Places Available We’re delighted to announce that Cunningtons is once again partnering with Farleigh Hospice for the annual Make a Will charity campaign this September! What We’re Offering ✅ Completely FREE Will preparation by our qualified solicitors;✅ Professional legal advice and guidance on making your Will; and of course,✅ Support […]
Planning for the future as we get older is a vital part of life – that’s why many of us provide for ourselves with pensions and Wills. However, one of the most important tools available to us is often neglected: Lasting Powers of Attorney. According to CanadaLife UK, 78% of UK adults don’t have a […]
Cunningtons help with "Your Legal Journey Through Life". We cover key areas: your first home, your relationships and family law, then growing families, employment matters, dispute resolutions, property investments, and planning your estate. We focus on continuity, trust, understanding clients, and personal service by offering the same legal team throughout life.
I offered on a flat that the estate agent told me was being sold share of freehold. This affected our decision to offer on the flat rather than another property we had seen and increased our offer. Through the conveyancing process we discovered that the flat was not share of freehold after all. When we questioned the estate agent we were told that the freeholder had changed their mind about selling the freehold.
If we decide not to go through with the purchase is the estate agent liable for our fees as they told us the property was share of freehold and did not notify us of the change?
We would think it unlikely that there would be any basis of claim. The freeholder may very well have changed their mind as any seller would be entitled to do before exchange of contracts.
If you do consider that the marketing or advertisement of the property was in some way misleading, you could consider making a complaint to any relevant redress scheme that the estate agent belongs to.
I’d like advice on stopcocks please. On 2nd viewing, after our offer had been accepted, we found a leak in the property which is a top floor flat. We looked for the stopcock in the flat to turn off the water but couldn’t find it. Seller had indicated stopcock (and water meter) were in the hall cupboard. We flagged the leak to the solicitor and said we could not find the stopcock. The water meter was actually outside, in the road. We got the reply that the leak had been fixed and the stopcock was in the cupboard. Date for completion has now been agreed. Our solicitor suggested we do a final check on the leak. This time the water had been turned off. Still no sign of the stopcock so we asked a neighbour who said there were no internal ones, only ones out under covers on the road. We can’t now check to see if any of the pipes are leaking as obviously don’t have access. Water co said it is strongly advisable for flats to have internal stopcocks, and that’s what we were expecting. It seems so minor but I don’t want to move in and find a ton of problems with leaky pipes. Seller just seems to be wasting our time over this. They also have the key to the garage which they said they would drop off to the agent. The agent doesn’t have it and the seller has now gone to an amber country. He doesn’t know when they’ll be back. Originally the seller didn’t even know the garage was part of the property – only when we got the deeds we could see it. We haven’t even been able to see in it as nobody has the key and with quarantine the seller won’t make it back before the completion date. Am now wondering if the cooker and washing machine will be working, let alone the heating, as the sellers seem so unreliable! The flat has been tenanted for a long time but even so…Is any of this misrepresentation?
Thank you for your comment. A misrepresentation occurs when someone says something that the other party relies on when entering into the contract and that statement is not accurate, causing a loss to the other party.
You should discuss the position with your solicitor. In particular, if you are unsure of the contractual position, you might want to discuss the point that clause 3 of the standard conditions of sale (which are normally incorporated into the contract) state that the buyer accepts the property in the physical condition that it is in on exchange.
I purchased a house the beginning of the year, when we looked around the property we specifically asked the Estate agent if there were any issue with neighbours etc. we were told not at all its a lovely neighbourhood.
We then decided to proceed with the purchase, and on the forms the sellers stated that they did not have any issues with neighbouring properties.
However since moving in, this was obviously not the case and we have since learned that the sellers had issues with the neighbour and that was the reason that they wanted to move.
Since moving in we have had endless issues with the same neighbour relating to drugs, loud music and general anti social behaviour. We have two small children who as scared in there own homes so this is a real problem.
Do we have any grounds for claims against the sellers?
We are sorry to hear of this and sadly, it is not uncommon. There are examples of cases where sellers have been ordered to pay damages to buyers because they have suggested that there are no disputes with neighbours and this turns out to be untrue.
Whether or not there is any sort of misrepresentation claim here will depend a great deal on the written correspondence and documentation, specifically the property information form. What you have been told orally is less likely to be relevant because the standard conditions of sale normally incorporated into a contract of sale exclude these as being actionable. An exception to this would be in cases of fraud.
Please do feel free to get in touch if you would like to consider the matter in more detail with us.